Anselm Jappe and the end of the wertkritik school?

JappeI might turn out to be wrong, but based on my reading of Anselm Jappe’s “Towards a History of the Critique of Value”, I think wertkritik has encountered its limits. In the essay, Jappe shows that all you can get from wertkritik is an ever longer laundry list of dumb shit that will go when labor goes. This effort played a crucial role historically by challenging Marxism in all of its varieties, but it cannot do what we need right now — indicate a path forward.

Jappe states wertkritik has refused to come up with practical actions based on its methodology, but this is a specious argument: What he should have said is what the critics say themselves: wertkritik cannot provide a practical guide to action.

“Marxism shouldn’t be understood as an identity-giving, wholesome position, which history proved to be erroneous, but should be reduced to a theoretical core that can help us to understand society, via a negative critique, even if it does not necessarily provide us with a way out. The call for the abolition of labor does not have immediate ramifications for Marxist politics.

There is no new program or a master plan for emancipation that can be developed out of the abolition of value. Rather, it can be seen as a condition of emancipation from value and the abstract system of oppression it represents. How emancipation will be achieved is a more complex story. We know what will not work: much of what the Old Left proposed as Marxist politics. A lot of that should be abandoned because, essentially, abstract domination cannot be abolished through the imposition of some other kind of direct, personal domination. If we are to critique the abstractions of the economic forms, we similarly have to target the political form itself. While Marx and Engels suggested as much by their formulation of the state eventually “withering away,” I think we need to be a lot more radical. Emancipation ultimately has to mean the abolishment of the political as well. This is contradictory in the present political situation, but we should not try to postpone this task until after the revolution. We should see the constraints and the fetishizations immanent to the political form as something we want to get rid of now.” –Elmar Flatschart, “Marx and Wertkritik

“All” wertkritik can tell us at this point is that all existing relations must be abolished — but it can get no further than this. This conclusion is, of course, light years ahead of the old Marxism, but it accomplishes little more than paralyzing its adherents.

Jappe writes:

“Although Marx’s critique of political economy remained central—at a time when even the left was “burying” Marx every day by proclaiming that history had proved him wrong—there was a definitive rupture with those Marxists who remained. While for the latter capitalism still had a long life ahead of it, at least as long as some revolutionary subject does not put an end to it (if not the classical proletariat, then one of its successors, contingent labourers, the populations of the global South, women), Kurz and his comrades claimed that capitalism will collapse because it can no longer produce enough value. However, there is no guarantee that this collapse will lead to some sort of emancipation. No social group defined according to its role in the production of value can be considered “in itself” beyond capitalist logic and therefore as necessarily fated to overcome it.”

This passage suggests that, beyond the mere collapse of capitalism, there is some as yet undiscovered secret subject contained within society that is required to achieve social emancipation. In fact, the opposite is the case: A definite mass of society has already been thrust beyond capitalist logic. This mass are those proletarians who are utterly cut off from all productive activity and all possibility to sell their labor power. They are “hidden” because they are only now beginning to appear in the advanced countries, but they have always been present in the slums of the less developed countries, where fascist state economic management was unable to disguise this unemployed mass with what Kurz calls simulated accumulation.

Capitalism cannot collapse without, at the same time, taking the wage laborer, the buying and selling of labor power, and “the job” with it. The historical mission of capital is to lock the wage slave out of the market in labor power, to deny her the possibility of selling her labor power, to render her labor power worthless as a commodity. The real historical legacy capitalism leaves to the wage slave is her unemployment; if capitalism absolutely subjugates the proletarian, this is only a preliminary step to expelling her altogether from the epoch of labor.

On the other hand, communism first makes its historical appearance as a very large mass of workers who cannot, under any circumstance, sell their labor power. This large mass of laborers, who have already been thrust outside of society, must, in turn, wrest the means to life from society. They need no justification for their actions than a will to survive and to establish their own conditions as the conditions of all humanity.

6 thoughts on “Anselm Jappe and the end of the wertkritik school?”

    1. In that case, we will both be right. 🙂

      EDIT: Of course, in the final analysis, only the followers of wertkritik will decide if this is truly the case.

      Like

  1. Jehu I have pretty much read through most of your posts recently but have a question. Marx and Engels, at least in the Communist Manifesto tells in chapter two: “The working men have no country. We cannot take from them what they have not got. Since the proletariat must first of all acquire political supremacy, must rise to be the leading class of the nation, must constitute itself the nation, it is so far, itself national, though not in the bourgeois sense of the word.”

    And, of course, they continue: “But whatever form they may have taken, one fact is common to all past ages, viz., the exploitation of one part of society by the other. No wonder, then, that the social consciousness of past ages, despite all the multiplicity and variety it displays, moves within certain common forms, or general ideas, which cannot completely vanish except with the total disappearance of class antagonisms. The Communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involved the most radical rupture with traditional ideas.”

    It seems that both a rupture in property relations and relations in intellectual ideas will need to take place for this to happen.

    My question is that as you’ve stated over and over communism must become global, not national how would the proletariat attain political supremacy, and become the new leading class, as a global class though not in the bourgeois sense? I understand what you’ve said several times about the abolishment of labor would in turn abolish capital. And as we both know this does not mean the abolishment of work per se which would still go on, only its organization under a capitalistic system of governance. So what new form would this take? Would this just be a program that will have to be worked out at that time by the proletariat itself without the intervention of a class of intellectuals? I’ll assume as much. I think you’re right that most Leftist intellectuals are bankrupt, that they have no ideas left, that they are finally at a point of end game. That the only ones that can work this out are the global proletariat itself.

    Like

    1. Oh, and, of course, forgot to add that ultimately I think this is why toward the end of that chapter they tell us flatly: “In place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.”

      The State will not wither away until there is a true ‘association’ that is global and free. It’s what we mean by Association that needs to be explained. Yes?

      Like

  2. Hello Jehu,
    I translated (into french) the last 2 paragraphs of this article and put them on my blog (with link to you, ofc)
    Thank you for your great site!
    Max

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: